|
|
LESSON 6The ImperativeThese forms are used to indicate orders, commands, suggestionsany form of telling someone else to do something. They, of course, lack first person singular forms (you don't normally tell yourself to do things, not out loud anyway) and also first person dual forms. They do, however, have third person forms, which indicate a kind of command at second hand: "let him do...", "let them do...". The endings are:
For example:
Vocative caseThe vocative is the case of direct address. It hasn't been considered as a separate case so far, since it is normally identical to the nominative case. However, in those nouns which in the nominative singular end in -s, the -s is dropped in the vocative (producing a form which is typically identical to the accusative). Example: Alareik, gif mis hilm meinana! "Alaric, give me my helmet!" Relative clauses:Gothic doesn't have a relative pronoun as such; relative clauses are introduced by the combination of the demonstrative pronoun/article (sa, so, thata) with the particle "ei", which can be translated "that", "who", or "which" (and often stands by itself). In most cases the junction is simple: sa+ei = saei "he who"; thaim+ei = thaimei "to them who, to those who". In some cases, however, there is "sandhi"a change at the boundary between the elements. There are two kinds of sandhi occurring in these pronouns:
This combined pronoun functions, however, like a relative pronoun in other languages; it agrees with its antecedent (the word it refers to) in gender and number, but takes the case appropriate to its position in the relative clause. Example: Weis sehwum thana mannan saei stal thata huzd. "We saw the man who stole the treasure." Saei "who" is masculine and singular like "mannan"; however, since it stands for "sa manna" in its clause (i.e., the sentence "lying behind" "saei stal thata huzd" is "sa manna stal thata huzd") it is nominative singular. Wit sehwu thata leik this mans thanei sa thiudans afsloh. "We two saw the body of the man whom the king killed." (afsloh = preterite of afslahan "to kill", related to slahan "strike"). Here "thanei" refers back to manna (here found in genitive singular); it agrees with manna in being masculine and singular, but is accusative because it really stands for "thana mannan". If this is confusing, you can try expanding the sentence: ...this mans thanei sa thiudans afsloh > this mans, thana mannan ei sa thiudans afsloh "of the man whom the king killed" > "of the man, (i.e.) that man whom the king killed" QuestionsQuestions are introduced by
Question words include:
hwas declines as a pronoun: only singular forms are available:
Note that the neuter singular is "hwa", which is somewhat irregular both from point of view of the internal structure of Gothic (you'd expect *hwata, cf. thata, ita) and by comparison with other Germanic languages (which have reflexes of *hwat, cf. English "what", German "was", Icelandic "hvat"). With the exception of hwas and hwa, the paradigm is just like that of sa. Examples:
-u most often follows ni, as in:
It is more rarely used elsewhere. After the ga- it is attached to the prefix making gau-: Gaulithuth jus du marein? "Did you travel to (the) sea?" Also used is the word "ibai", which both indicates the presence of a question and the presumption that it will be answered negatively: Ibai magt qithan Gutisko "You can't speak Gothic, can you?" (Gutisko - an adverbial form, "Gothically", modifying qithan) Questions merely asking for confirmation or disconfirmation can be answered with ja or jai "yes", ne "no". Words:
Exercises:
On to Lesson 7. |